Saturday, April 18, 2009

Copyright and Fair Use: Web 2.0 Rights and Responsibilties



It is obvious from the many videos, articles, papers, lawsuits, and debates currently happening around the world that copyright laws need to be revised in order to balance the rights of educators to use digital content (Fair Use) and the responsibility to honor creators' intellectual rights (Copyright) in the Web 2.0 world of creation and collaboration.

Problems

I found the white paper, The Digital Learning Challenge: Obstacles to Educational uses of Copyrighted Material in the Digital Age, published by the Berkman Center for Internet and Society, that explored "whether innovative educational uses of digital technology were hampered by the restrictions of copyright.” extremely informative. Their research identified four key obstacles current copyright law creates for educators:

1 Unclear or inadequate copyright law relating to crucial provisions such as fair use and educational use; This is why rulings are so unpredictable and sometimes swayed by the judge's moral stance. "Fair use involves subjective judgments and are often affected by factors such as a judge or jury 's personal sense of right or wrong." (From Standford University's website on Copyright & Fair Use.)

2. Extensive adoption of “digital rights management” technology to lock up content;

3. Practical difficulties obtaining the right to use content when licenses are necessary;

4. Undue caution by gatekeepers such as publishers or educational administrators.


Solutions


As with the privacy issue faced by educators and students tapping into the digital power of Web 2.0, there are legal, technological and self-regulatory steps we need in order to tackle the current problems.

Legal: These steps would include amendments to the Copyright law, rewriting the TEACH Act, reducing statutory damages for educational infringement, and reforming licensing much like Creative Commons has done.

Technological: These steps would include using tools ("automated interactive licensing) that facilitate getting copyright clearance. “Digital tools could automate and lubricate much of the clearance process, from analyzing whether a license is necessary to securing a license if required.”

Self-regulatory: These steps, which educators can and should tackle immediately are

1. Defining and developing educator best-practices in the use of digital content. Some examples are . . . I would add that as groups of educators define and develop common agreements, they need to first and foremost build common understanding using such excellent sources as the following:
2. Making educationally useful content easily accessible to educators

Conclusion
Digital content offers incredible, unprecedented opportunities for teaching and learning around the world. If we are to truly tap into this rich resource, we need to confront the obstacles mentioned in the Berkman paper. As educators we can no longer sit back and wait for others to take action, we need to be involved in the legal, technological, and personal steps necessary to turn this powerful potential into a shared creative and collaborative culture.

Friday, April 17, 2009

Online privacy: possible, probable, or prohibitive?

As we enjoy the increased advantages of the web 2.0 social world, share ware and “cloud” storage, I concur with the Center for Democracy & Technology that online data privacy is becoming the primary concern of internet users. If not dealt with appropriately, the huge potential the internet holds for the world will be greatly limited.



Even the Net Gen cheerleader, Don Topscott, sees this “dark cloud . . that few Net Geners have yet seen. . . I don’t think the Net Geners fully understand the long-term consequences of sharing intimate information about themselves with the world.” In his book Grown Up Digital, he is alerting us all to the perils hidden on the other side of all these great new tools we've started to take for granted:

1. Miniature audio and video recorders:
Positive = convenience,
Negative = anyone can get a picture of you almost anytime (with or without you being aware) and upload it and share as they choose (not you!)

2. Cell phones with GPS:
Positive = help for when you’re lost or in an emergency situation;
Negative = you can be tracked 24/7/365

3. Social networking software:
Positive = quick, easy connection and access to friends;
Negative = not always having the ability to control what information you’re sharing with whom.

4. Online shopping/banking:
Positive = convenience and time saver;
Negative = sending private data out to the cloud (hoping that it is well encrypted), risk of stolen identities

5. Google (and other powerful search engines):
Positive = powerful search engine
Negative = gathering and selling information about you without your knowledge

Luckily, as the Center for Democracy and Technology states, “a unique combination of tools -- legal, technical, and self-regulatory -- is being designed to address the privacy concerns of Internet users.” Therefore, as educators and internet users, we need to educate ourselves and our students to take the self-regulatory and technical steps possible to safe guard our online data privacy. And as citizens we need to fight for adequate legal regulations that will address these privacy risks.

Self-Regulatory and Technical Steps

Here are a few good resources to increase our own understanding of how to improve privacy and help our students understand

1. 5 steps to better online privacy (includes list for several technical privacy tools including firewalls, cookie removers, anonymous web browsers, and anti-spyware tools) from the Australian government.

2. Extensive guide to Online Privacy from the Center for Democracy & Technology

3. On Guard Online (a Web site sponsored by the federal government and the technology industry to help users stay on guard against Internet fraud, secure their computers, and protect their personal information.) which includes tips, interactive “Cyber smarts” quizzes, and videos about online safety.

Mobile Platform and Cloud Computing

As more and more users online time is shifting to the mobile platform functioning "in the cloud", it is key to learn about and talk with kids about guarding their privacy there as well. The Center for Digital Democracy came up with Ten Questions To Ask Your Cell Phone Provider—and the Online Marketers They Work With—to Protect Your Mobile Privacy.

Legal and Technical Steps

The above issues were some of the more obvious ones. Luckily there are legislative organizations tackling the more complex and "invisible" online privacy issues. Check out this YouTube 7-minute video interview with Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, about the state of online privacy and the challenges citizens face today.


You may also want to check out their extensive Online Guide to Practical Privacy Tools (i.e. snoop proof email, anonymous surfing, and encryption tools.)

It is evident that we need to have regulations in order for companies to be responsible in safeguarding and educating consumers about privacy issues. Here are some specific recent legal actions being taken in this arena:

1. FTC's Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
2. European Union takes legal action against a British online advertising technology
3. EPIC Files FTC complain concerning GOOGLE Data breach, calls for federal investigation into cloud computing security

Still wondering . . .

We obviously have a long road ahead in our journey of trying to secure online privacy. I remain curious to see to what extent we will ever be able to safeguard our online privacy and to what extent companies will help or hinder the average user in reaching this goal. I remain cautiously hopeful that human ingenuity will overcome all obstacles at the technical and self-regulatory levels. However, don't we need international level of legal steps since functioning in the cloud does not correspond to geopolitcal borders? If we can't get unanimous agreement on nuclear disarmament or a ban on landmines, how can we hope that all nations will agree to the same level of online privacy legislation?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/room929/428260081/